
FLIKR
© 2019 Robert Osburn
Worldwide, Christians are the single most persecuted religious group worldwide. This fact was confirmed by a Pew Center report issued just last week that focused on government restrictions and social hostility against religious groups.
China is one of the places where government restrictions have been increasing for the past five years at least. What I have noticed about US Christians is that we tend to idealize, or paint an unrealistic picture of the persecuted church in places like China. We think that external opposition cements unity within the church. That’s not always the case, and persecuted churches are sometimes far from rosy.
But why do we persist in idealizing them? Why do painful torture, social ostracism, long imprisonments, and, sometimes, often-cruel death lead to rhetorical exaggerations like those behind this story on the number of Christians executed each year for their faith?
As Calvin University scholar Li Ma discovered during a decade’s worth of interviews in China, the Chinese church is very complex story but we Western Christians tend to distill their story into a single narrative of “persecution.” In doing so, we overlook a lot of messy details that sound like some of our ugly church fights, sexual scandals involving church leaders, “he said/she said,” and general tawdriness unbefitting the Bride of Christ.
As Ma carefully and exhaustively documents in her case study of a famous Chinese church, Religious Entrepreneurism in China’s Urban House Churches (2019), the church’s pastoral leadership, especially pre-eminent leader Yi Wang, is embroiled in all of these sad realities that afflict American churches. Persecution glamor loses almost all of its sheen in this scholarly work that details petty infighting among pastors, Yi Wang’s aggressive posturing that pokes fingers in the eyes of Chinese political leadership, a horrific church trial, open pirating of copyrighted Christian texts, complex enmities, and all within the Christian community in one corner of China.
But, lest I throw stones, let me briefly tell the personal story of a once-ideal American church that fell prey to a few of the same dynamics.
46 years ago, while in seminary, I became involved as a lay leader in what was at the time one of America’s most innovative evangelical churches. There was, indisputably, a wonderful work of God in that church, but when encouraged (in Spring 1978) to write the story of our church’s great successes, the lead pastor hesitated, thinking it too early to tell a story that could sour someday.
His prescience was justified. About three years later the church experienced a wrenching split that would come to be known as “Black Sunday.” Little more than three more years later, the associate pastor who had emerged “victorious” in 1981 went on to commit a foul crime (for which he has since fully repented) that led directly to more than a decade as a prisoner in one of his state’s most well-known prisons. (Ironically, the Chinese pastor at the heart of Li Ma’s story is detained by Chinese authorities as I write.)
Besides the realization that all of us in Body of Christ find ourselves occasionally enrolled in the School of Humility by such church scandals, we still need an answer to the question posed at the beginning of the article: Why idealize persecuted churches?
I think there are several factors. First, we want stories of valiance and heroism that avert our gaze upon the sinfulness of our heroes. As humans, we are desperate for heroes, even more so when we read important works like Li Ma’s. For example, I love to tell the grand story of William Wilberforce’s heroism, especially his valiant fight against slavery and the slave trade. He isa hero, but he had feet of clay. Not only was he almost reckless with money (usually erring on the side of generosity), but he was, well…the only word is addicted to opium (there were no other known ways of controlling physical pain at that time). As much as we want to exalt our heroes, the only one completely devoid of our tragic sinfulness is Jesus Christ.
I think a second reason that we idealize the persecuted church, for example in China, is that we like our stories to be simple and straightforward. Author Ma could have been more generous toward journalist June Cheng when Ma writes that “internal power struggles did not interest” Cheng, a journalist for World magazine. Cheng was trying to tell a complex story for an American audience enamored by simplicity. Rather, human beings’ “leftover beauty” (Edith Schaeffer’s term for God’s image imprinted on all of us who are also tragically sinful) means the stories of the persecuted church are inevitably more complex than a reporter can ever unpack. Paul’s letters to churches, and not least the Book of Acts, reveal tremendous complexity in church life.
A third reason that we idealize the persecuted church, whether in China or elsewhere, is that most of us would like to imagine a better church reality than what many of us experience stateside. Those of us in the sometimes scandalous, occasionally glorious Western church often realize that, for all the secular opposition we sometimes face in our universities, for example, we live a rather predictable, all-too-often complacent church existence. The drowsy sermon, the church members with personality problems, the bruising fight over the color of the church carpet, the songs we sing….There has to be a better example of church elsewhere on the globe!
Utilizing concepts developed in the world of sociology, Dr. Ma has carefully pulled back the covers, sometimes in excruciating detail, on a painful church experience in a place where churches should be refined because of persecution.
There never was a perfect church. There never will be.
Better than idealize Chinese Christians, let us pray for one another and, with at least a portion of Li Ma’s rigor, let us face honestly the good and the bad in our churches. I suspect that the sunshine that results will genuinely help renew our churches. We have Dr. Ma to thank for an outstanding work of scholarship that fosters realism instead of idealism while leaving intact the glory of Jesus Christ, the church’s Bridegroom.
In fairness to Wilberforce, it should be said his doctor prescribed opium to him when he was 29 to which he became addicted. Not quite the same as the mayor of DC becoming addicted to cocaine. Not quite the same as someone seeking mind altering experiences thru the illicit use of drugs instead of seeking pleasure in God.
But Wilberforce, as you say, was flawed like the rest of us. His lack of wisdom in finances being a character flaw while his addiction to opium more the result of bad medical practice than a moral failure.
Well said, Dr. Osburn. Your thesis that there is no perfect church, that we need to "foster realism instead of idealism while leaving intact the glory of Jesus Christ" can also be applied to the many persons we meet upon the pages of Scripture. Abraham was wily and prone to lie. Jacob, also. Moses was not allowed to go into the promised land due to character flaws. David, as we all know, sinned greatly. Peter had his weak moments where he denied Christ. Paul had a history of persecuting the church and blaspheming God. At the same time, God was constantly predicting that there would come someone, a leader, who would not sin and would have the holiness and power to not only atone for sin, but also defeat the Serpent. He was the fulfillment of the promise that the seed of the woman would be victorious. The lesson to be learned? There is no one past, present, or future that is worthy of our unqualified praise.
Revelation 5:2–5, "And I saw a mighty angel proclaiming with a loud voice, “Who is worthy to open the scroll and break its seals?” And no one in Heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or to look into it, and I began to weep loudly because no one was found worthy to open the scroll or to look into it. And one of the elders said to me, “Weep no more; behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has conquered, so that he can open the scroll and its seven seals.”
Thanks for making this known. As a foreign teacher in China for 7 years I see this reality, not only of the "persecuted" church in China, but with the church (general term) when I am home in America for just 6-7 weeks every summer. Bigger is better I find no where in Jesus’ incarnational, in many cases, one-on-one approach, except perhaps the feeding of the 5 and 4,000. But John’s account and teaching on the bread of life should be a great warning to us that size and focus on numbers is a just a re-visitation of a tower of Babel mentality. Add to that our "idolization" of church leaders and it ends up in dissolution in many cases as church leaders are not infallible. The laity needs to be empowered to live and act, using all the gifts of the local church for God’s glory and no single person takes all the honor, or should I say any of its honor or success.